<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>FontStruct | FontStruction Feed: Magnum</title>
	<link>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/100863</link>
	<description>FontStruct comment feed for the FontStruction: Magnum</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<pubDate>Thu, 08 Jan 2009 14:25:01 -0800</pubDate> 
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <generator>CakePHP</generator> 
	<item>
		<title>Comment from Axel Leyer</title>
		<link>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/100863#3364</link>
		<description></description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 07:12:41 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/100863#3364</guid> 
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment from guentersen</title>
		<link>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/100863#3367</link>
		<description>Strike!</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 04:15:28 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/100863#3367</guid> 
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment from thalamic</title>
		<link>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/100863#3368</link>
		<description>Professional! :)</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 05:54:47 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/100863#3368</guid> 
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment from Em42</title>
		<link>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/100863#3371</link>
		<description>Very well balanced, I like it!

I would only consider adding a serif to the numeral "5", and rethink a couple of secondary glyphs (e.g. the "?" looks too thin, the "@" too small, the "&" a little awkward). Anyway they are just minor details.

P.S. The sample image you post when sharing your fonts are beautifully designed: try to use the GIF or PNG format instead of JPG, because the JPG compression generates too many artifacts along the letter edge.</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 06:54:53 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/100863#3371</guid> 
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment from Axel Leyer</title>
		<link>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/100863#3372</link>
		<description>@Em42 : Yes... you´re right...forgot the serif on "5" and have to rethink some glyphs... It will be redo in next days... ;)
Thanks for your comments...I´ve changed the imege to gif, now it has no artifacts</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 07:31:35 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/100863#3372</guid> 
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment from Axel Leyer</title>
		<link>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/100863#3373</link>
		<description>OK, changed the "@", "&" and "?"...but on "5"...I think it works better without "serif" and match better with the other numbers...</description>
		<pubDate>Tue, 23 Sep 2008 08:04:08 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/100863#3373</guid> 
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment from geneus1</title>
		<link>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/100863#3783</link>
		<description>Simply Slabulous!</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 03:16:42 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/100863#3783</guid> 
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment from intaglio</title>
		<link>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/100863#3791</link>
		<description>Yup. One of the best Fontstruct slabs, for sure.
@em42: great tip on using .png or gif instead of jpeg. I was wondering why some samplers looked better than others.</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 11 Oct 2008 03:54:31 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/100863#3791</guid> 
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>