CakePHPen-usTue, 24 Nov 2009 19:41:57 +0000Tue, 24 Nov 2009 19:41:57 +0000http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rssFontStruct | FontStruction Feed: fs The Ihttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449FontStruct comment feed for the FontStruction: fs The IComment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5563http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5563<br /><img src="/showings/show/744" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from saberriderhttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5574http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5574awesome and very useful. i love that touch of bauhaus design. the only thing that distracts me a little is the x. i can see that there arent many solutions in that system but it really reminds me of a swastika (not the nazi one but the traditional sign). i would really much appreciate an alternative x but the typeface is great anyway.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5578http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5578Thanks, saberrider. The x has been updated, as requested. Enjoy.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from saberriderhttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5581http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5581cool. i like x much better now. :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from intagliohttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5582http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5582Nifty idea. You really have a talent for visualising quite difficult things. And getting more so as time goes on.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from SquarePeghttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5591http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5591I voted only 9 points because there are no numerals (coming soon, perhaps?)... This is excellent, thalamic!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5594http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5594another nice one :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5596http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5596@saberrider, funk_king: Thank you. Encouragement makes it easy to continue. @intaglio: This was a fun font to do. How suggestible we all are! @SquarePeg: Thanks. These numerals are for you.<br /><img src="/showings/show/747" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from SquarePeghttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5601http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5601I've raised my vote to 10 points, thalamic. :-)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Zinihttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5603http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5603this one is amazing! getting the 3D-effect without an outline. i consider if a non-italic version is possible with fontstruct...Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from jmarquezhttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5615http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5615This one calls for a uppercase. good job.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5643http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5643Improvement or made it worse?<br /><img src="/showings/show/755" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from SquarePeghttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5647http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5647Well, I think the <strong>t</strong> is harder to read now... But I don't think the half-serifs are all that bad. But maybe you should (gasp!) have two versions of The I. Part of the older version's strength, for me, was the simplicity of the shapes.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from afrojethttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5654http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5654Hey Thamlamic. Great concept. I've been toying with an oblique 'Struction as well but thought I'd put it on the back-burner until some kind of right side tracking came down the pipe. Do you care to share any strategies you used in spacing this one out on the grid?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5659http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5659@SquarePeg: I agree. Maybe I will clone it and re-simplify it. But the <b>t</b> is more interesting now, no? @afrojet: Nothing special. Some characters are at the left edge, some go left one, some two; <b>j</b> goes over 6 grid spaces; etc. The oblique makes it convenient to have bottom-right serifs as they still fit in the top-right overhang. The same thing makes kerning a nightmare for <b>d</b>, <b>f</b> and <b>l</b> because they extend to the right two grid spaces too much. The sample is manually kerned. (--added extra kern space between <b>t</b> / <b>h</b>, removed same between <b>d</b> / <b>i</b> and <b>d</b> / <b>e</b>; the rest are default--) I enabled Clone so check it out. :) Defining the right side limit would definitely fix some of the kerning problems but it won't be a full kerning solution. Someday, if I get bored of FontStruct, I may try to fix the kerning issues in FontLab. Some-distant-day, ie.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5673http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5673afrojet's comment got me intrigued. Although the left starting point for each glyph in this and The I Flat is the same, the shadow is two grid spaces wide, hence the width of each character in The I was a bit more than The I Flat, making it tedious to lay one on top of the other, requiring per-character kerning at design time. So I broke out FontLab and cleaned up points, fixed the metrics and added kerning info into this and The I Flat. The result is shown in the sample below, which is just two layers of text, one in each font, without any manual adjustment. I can't upload those fonts anywhere, but if you contact me though the handy-dandy message service with your address, I'll be glad to email them to you.<br /><img src="/showings/show/763" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from afrojethttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5675http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5675Most excellent. Thanks for the pointers. I will be eager to compare the two.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from geneus1http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5846http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5846I'm gone for a while and miss out on all the fun. Splendid, thalamic. Now I can't wait for right side tracking.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from laynecomhttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5942http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#5942It always amazes me what you can come up with, thalamic. Great work.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from thalamichttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#6254http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#6254Thanks guys. The I and <a href="http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/139570">The I Flat</a> have been re-mastered--thanks to the new spacing controls. <b>The I Flat</b> should now lie on top of the <b>The I</b> perfectly aligned without the need to manually kern one or the other. The ying to the yang, Gene. :)<br /><img src="/showings/show/886" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from emepar7http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#7088http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#7088All the letters look so perfect. I think the space is a bit too narrow though.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from kixhttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#7094http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#7094sorry man... @emepar7: you seem to have the need to do something better in everything, right? You made some really "obscure" suggestions on here, not always and sometimes really useful. But in some of your comments, i don't know what to think... Do you honestly think thalamic didn't balance the space button's width by his own feeling/decision ? Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from emepar7http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#7119http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#7119I have nothing but love for this font...it's a 10/10. The stars are to vote on a font, isn't the discussion to say (subjectively) what works and what doesn't? I wish people critiqued my fonts more not less! That's the only way to improve. I downloaded this awhile ago but just looked at the sample text and found it hard to read.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from jhejkahttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#7512http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#7512Great job! I'm making my own version of this with capitals.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from funk_kinghttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#8290http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#8290where you been?Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Kohjihttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#8672http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#8672Great job!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from stormhttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#13712http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/138449#13712ilikeThu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000