FontStruct | FontStruction Feed: A Fault in Reality

Comment from minimum

Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

Comment from kix

Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

whoa!

Comment from gauz

Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

greattt!

Comment from Magic Sam

Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

Holy shit! That´s a really nice concept.

Comment from aphoria

Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

Wow. It almost makes me dizzy. Great stuff!

Comment from afrojet

Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

One of the nice things about any Fontstruction is that it's very transparent to the community of users the kind of work that went into making it. You can't hide behind PS filters, stock art, or other tricky shortcuts. It makes looking at a font like this so much richer. I can see quickly the knuckle-grinding work (and thought) that went into this one. Nice job.

Comment from minimum

Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

Thank you for the nice words, everyone. I am grateful to all of you (and everyone else) for your (and their) own fontsuctions because they make me learn. Creativity is boundless here. It's awesome to see. :D @afrojet: This was a surprisingly simple font to do. There I was waiting for someone to get dressed and ready, looking at a wall in sharp perspective with circular decorative pieces hung on it...and my mind wandered. I had the font complete in my head before my waiting was over. The hard part was done. Next it was just a matter of getting 6x10 matrix of dots live, and a simple copy/paste the dot-block on each letter and deleting the dots not needed. Doing it did not take more than 45 minutes, nor should it have because it is basically just a 6x10 dot-matrix font. Thank you.

Comment from djnippa

Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

Mind blowing. Great for logos.

Comment from SquarePeg

Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

Whoa! is right! Spectacular, minimum.

Comment from emepar7

Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

Every now and then I come across a font that makes me jealous...this one of them :)

Comment from nemoorange

Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

Brilliant!! Using the dot matrix is pretty darn clever, and opens the door for other more complex ideas.

Comment from funk_king

Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

great work. maybe you can do mirror-image version - where it goes from smaller to larger / left to right - for your lc?

Comment from geneus1

Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

Another creative and brick-bending achievement, minimum. Bravo!

Comment from minimum

Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

It's interesting what gets attention and what doesn't. This was just a simple idea and an average execution. Furthermore, there are just so many bricks (dots) here, that it is virtually unusable. I guess it looks kinda cool. Maybe it should have been named 'An Exercise in Futility'. Heh. Thanks all for the appreciation. @funk_king: Consider it done.

Comment from Dec4080

Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

It looks like ur on teh side and not in front nice work!

Comment from machocr

Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

Really nice!

Comment from jmarquez

Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

amazing work. ps: what's up with the "Q"

Comment from prototype

Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

Dear Minimum. I really like your work & your conception. (+ name, + plus concept ... +++) This one - looks great. (to me) But turns me on - 0.00%. IMHO, you should (could, might, etc.) go back to the roots of your name. (Back to the SHAPE OF THINGS -, not back to a SPECIAL EFFECTS department.) Do you want me to laugh or cry?

Comment from minimum

Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

Haha. "No more special effects." Got it.

Comment from geneus1

Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

No more special effects?!? Yeah, I'll be sure to tell that to Steven Spielberg and Michael Bay for the next Transformers movie. "Hey, you guys, could you, like, put less explosions and special effects in this? Thanks!" Manifest and share whatever creative expression inspires you, whether it makes people laugh or cry. Why not do both and show your range. =)

Comment from minimum

Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

Hehe. Thanks, Geneus1. I was merely agreeing with him because the alternative was getting into an argument. Although, I'm not sure if I have a "range". Even I have no idea what's coming up next. Currently I am struggling with a lowercase 's'. It is winning...so far. ;)

Comment from kix

Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

maybe trying the "handwritten" style for an "s"? looks easier, and maybe cooler :)

Comment from nampnz

Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

it' s great

Comment from ngo2graphics

Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

WOW!!! I think this is really effective and unique and so detailed. A really great fontstruction!!

Comment from ngo2graphics

Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000

Can you take a look at mine pls, Pixelo, I created this on the same kinda concept not realising that you have done it before me, lol, but let me know what you think.