<rss version="2.0" xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/">
<channel>
	<title>FontStruct | FontStruction Feed: Structurosa Script</title>
	<link>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/7451</link>
	<description>FontStruct comment feed for the FontStruction: Structurosa Script</description>
	<language>en-us</language>
	<pubDate>Tue, 02 Dec 2008 09:08:44 -0800</pubDate> 
    <docs>http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss</docs>
    <generator>CakePHP</generator> 
	<item>
		<title>Comment from dasmuse</title>
		<link>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/7451#487</link>
		<description>Hello !

Amazing font, very nice i like it, i love it, i eat it !!!! ;) 

Seeyou</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 24 Apr 2008 06:12:30 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/7451#487</guid> 
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment from Funkappa</title>
		<link>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/7451#591</link>
		<description>Very pretty font.  Cute but also menacing.</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 03 May 2008 18:24:16 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/7451#591</guid> 
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment from joelh</title>
		<link>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/7451#648</link>
		<description>Love it. My only concern is the s. Obviously you're limited by the application's constraints, but is there a better way to resolve that character?</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:01:57 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/7451#648</guid> 
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment from pauldhunt</title>
		<link>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/7451#650</link>
		<description>thanks for all the nice comments! i changed the s. let me know if you think it's an improvement. there are a few other characters that i'm not crazy about and will have to think on a bit longer.</description>
		<pubDate>Thu, 08 May 2008 12:31:20 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/7451#650</guid> 
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment from dannyglix</title>
		<link>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/7451#693</link>
		<description>nice work</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 10 May 2008 20:34:47 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/7451#693</guid> 
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment from typerider</title>
		<link>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/7451#954</link>
		<description>wonderful font!
vivid. Still, wish i could see the first 's',
missed it…</description>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 May 2008 15:49:12 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/7451#954</guid> 
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment from kellyfont</title>
		<link>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/7451#1308</link>
		<description>Fun stuff but you really must get some sleep. I love the 'o' best and also the 'b' as in airborne - ready to take flight.</description>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 17:00:22 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/7451#1308</guid> 
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment from relg</title>
		<link>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/7451#1370</link>
		<description>ATM under classic says this font is damaged.</description>
		<pubDate>Fri, 27 Jun 2008 17:39:35 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/7451#1370</guid> 
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment from amdesign</title>
		<link>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/7451#1382</link>
		<description>the right side of the "w" would be a good starting point to resolve the "s" legibility.</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 14:54:35 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/7451#1382</guid> 
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>Comment from schoener_als_du</title>
		<link>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/7451#1390</link>
		<description>wow - it's very nice! The "s" still is unsolved... I think also, that it could be a cut from the "w". Thank you for sharing!</description>
		<pubDate>Sat, 28 Jun 2008 23:22:39 -0700</pubDate>
		<guid>http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/7451#1390</guid> 
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>