CakePHPen-usMon, 23 Nov 2009 23:25:41 +0000Mon, 23 Nov 2009 23:25:41 +0000http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rssFontStruct | FontStruction Feed: Doodekahttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953FontStruct comment feed for the FontStruction: DoodekaComment from Stewfhttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#1913http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#1913From the author's blog:<br /><img src="/showings/show/81" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Stewfhttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#1914http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#1914<br /><img src="/showings/show/82" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Em42http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#1940http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#1940By the way, this is the blog link: <a href="http://www.house42.com">www.house42.com</a>.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from meekhttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#1942http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#1942I love the use of the simple modular geometry in a legible sans. Very clever.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from kixhttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#1949http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#1949just cool... you guys are truly in love with letters. just cool...Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Em42http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#1983http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#1983@ meek: thanks a lot! I'm honored to receive a comment from you. @ kix: thanks! From what I can see you share the same love. :) Since yesterday the downloadable font has smoother diagonals than the ones you can see in the big O above, as the developers fixed a small bug. Thanks again Rob!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from geneus1http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#2005http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#2005I really like your approach on this one, Em. It doesn't deny its modularity, it revels in it. This one was hard to find. It's like a ninja font - it seems to be eluding the font preview on me, but the images on the comments are really nice. Looks like the "Top Pick" is hiding out also, but it might just be my computer acting up again. Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Stewfhttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#2009http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#2009The lack of Top Pickness was admin error. It has been corrected.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Em42http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#2030http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#2030@ geneus1: thanks! The <em>ninja</em> behaviour is due to the large grid size I had to use to make the dodecagon visible also in the counters. And you are perfectly right: I was not satisfied by the <em>bezier technique</em> used with great mastery by <a href="http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/79653">williaum</a> and <a href="http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/85072">kix</a>, so I decided to emphasize the lack of roundness. @ Stewf: thanks for the Top Pick mark! :) @ williaum: thanks, you are too kind! I'm really curious about the different weights of the <a href="http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/79653">Vandal Gothic</a> family. I was going to fontstruct a light version of Doodeka, but the kerning became a real issue, and for the moment it remains in standby.Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from nemoorangehttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#2080http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#2080I really enjoy how you stuck to 12 sides, and didn't add another 4 with the 45 degree angle blocks. I'm surprise at how few new fontstructions are taking advantage of the half-angled blocks and making some circles, or at least dodecagons. Hopefully this font can stand as a prime example of how good full circles can look!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from f_puschmannhttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#2797http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#2797beautiful :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Em42http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#2800http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#2800@nemoorange: glad you like it. As I said above I preferred to limit the circle to twelve sides, because I thought that using sixteen sides made the shape neither a polygon nor a circle. @f_puschmann: thanks a lot!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Axel Leyerhttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#3606http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#3606Really, really great...good concept for a nice result. :)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from aktywistahttp://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#3969http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#3969u're master !Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Em42http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#3995http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#3995@Axel and Actywista: I'm honored you both like this font!Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from emepar7http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#7004http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#7004I love how you've embraced the modularity! (That's a word, right?)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Em42http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#7016http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#7016Thanks Emepar, I think it is the right word. :) (BTW, looking back at this font I fixed the space width that was not available in July 08...)Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000Comment from Em42http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#7620http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/76953#7620<br /><img src="/showings/show/1166" alt="" />Thu, 01 Jan 1970 00:00:00 +0000