http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/81395 FontStruct comment feed for the FontStruction: Rubrix en-us Tue, 02 Dec 2008 08:57:25 -0800 http://blogs.law.harvard.edu/tech/rss CakePHP http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/81395#1835 superduperbrilliant execution :D great job Tue, 22 Jul 2008 16:42:10 -0700 http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/81395#1835 http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/81395#1847 brilliant is the word. like a course of lit up planetoids in some alternate reality disco asteroid belt . . . Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:21:04 -0700 http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/81395#1847 http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/81395#1848 . . . sorry, that semicolon is a meteor! Wed, 23 Jul 2008 18:23:16 -0700 http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/81395#1848 http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/81395#1857 Good job with your font. Thu, 24 Jul 2008 12:34:08 -0700 http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/81395#1857 http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/81395#1878 WOW! Fri, 25 Jul 2008 15:58:55 -0700 http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/81395#1878 http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/81395#1888 Very entertaining, geneus1. I am admiring the consistency of this font. However, I am surprised that this is rated highest between your fonts. Don't get me wrong, it's beautiful, but IMHO your hulk and weaver fonts are much better. Sun, 27 Jul 2008 07:38:55 -0700 http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/81395#1888 http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/81395#1905 @hisham4444: i dont think you can compare this fonts in any way, but i think this rubik-one needed a lot more creativity and a brilliant idea than for example the hulkfont...which is great indeed. + i like the "barely legible"-tag :) Mon, 28 Jul 2008 16:14:46 -0700 http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/81395#1905 http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/81395#1927 Thank you all for the kind words. I am tempted to name my next creation "The Meteoric Interplanetary SuperDuperBrilliant Alternate Reality Disco Ball Font." hisham4444: I am often surprised and entertained by the FontStruct rating system. I am grateful for each and every vote. Since they are largely out of my control, I like to sit back and watch the ratings as if I let "the kids" go up and down on a rollercoaster. Only I know who the kids really are, how complex they are, their uniqueness, their strengths and weaknesses, but letting them go allows me to see how the world sees them, whatever the score. kix: FYI- I don't really compare "the kids," but for me, the HulkSmash font required greater creativity and technicality per glyph. For Rubrix, once I created the foundation for the cube design, the rest was fairly simple since everything was pretty much confined to a 3x3 matrix. For HulkSmash, twice as many bricks were used, the grid space was taller and wider, utilized scaled and overlapping bricks, and an original font designed to be sliced and shifted and smashed in different places on each character, all while attempting to look non-modular. Mon, 28 Jul 2008 20:39:18 -0700 http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/81395#1927 http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/81395#1934 ok... i didn't see it that way, but it sounds pretty logic. Mon, 28 Jul 2008 22:08:52 -0700 http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/81395#1934 http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/81395#1980 I would like to see that fontstruction – coming from you it would probably be awesome and intriguing – but suggest you use an acronym for the name: T.M.I.S.D.B.A.R.D.B.F. Wed, 30 Jul 2008 09:06:26 -0700 http://fontstruct.fontshop.com/fontstructions/show/81395#1980