The Gallery: Browse and find FontStructions

What’s New

Top Picks

Everything

We found 3 FontStructions matching “Glyph”. Hide OptionsHide Options

Chesterfield King

 by afrojetThis FontStruction was selected by FontStruct staff.This%20FontStruction%20was%20selected%20by%20FontStruct%20staff.
  • Currently 6.8
6.8 (17 votes)
Last change: 16.12.2008
Tags: Condensed, Poster, Sans, Tall, King
Category: Sans Serif, Display
86 Downloads86%20Downloads867 Comments7%20Comments7161 Glyphs161%20Glyphs161The Chesterfield Royal Family was formed from my desire to add new weights to the original Chesterfield typeface. In the process of drawing these new weights, I began modifying some of the forms of the new glyphs away from the original Chesterfield glyphs in order to build a more flexible brick/grid structure for the development of various weights. The most noticeable difference between these three new faces and the original is the lowered x-height. That said, there are still some compromises between the different weights and because of that I've given them these royalty names instead of the normal practice of light, regular, and bold weight names. One of the biggest compromises occurs in the Prince weight, where I was unable to add the notch where bowls and shoulders meet stems (see King and Queen weights) without adding too much extra black weight to those parts of the glyph. A work in progress for sure. Any help/thoughts/repulsions/bile appreciated. See also: Chesterfield Queen and Chesterfield PrinceThe%20Chesterfield%20Royal%20Family%20was%20formed%20from%20my%20desire%20to%20add%20new%20weights%20to%20%3Ca%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Ffontstruct.fontshop.com%2Ffontstructions%2Fshow%2F78304%22%3Ethe%20original%20Chesterfield%3C%2Fa%3E%20typeface.%20In%20the%20process%20of%20drawing%20these%20new%20weights%2C%20I%20began%20modifying%20some%20of%20the%20forms%20of%20the%20new%20glyphs%20away%20from%20the%20original%20Chesterfield%20glyphs%20in%20order%20to%20build%20a%20more%20flexible%20brick%2Fgrid%20structure%20for%20the%20development%20of%20various%20weights.%20The%20most%20noticeable%20difference%20between%20these%20three%20new%20faces%20and%20the%20original%20is%20the%20lowered%20x-height.%20That%20said%2C%20there%20are%20still%20some%20compromises%20between%20the%20different%20weights%20and%20because%20of%20that%20I%27ve%20given%20them%20these%20royalty%20names%20instead%20of%20the%20normal%20practice%20of%20light%2C%20regular%2C%20and%20bold%20weight%20names.%20One%20of%20the%20biggest%20compromises%20occurs%20in%20the%20Prince%20weight%2C%20where%20I%20was%20unable%20to%20add%20the%20notch%20where%20bowls%20and%20shoulders%20meet%20stems%20%28see%20King%20and%20Queen%20weights%29%20without%20adding%20too%20much%20extra%20black%20weight%20to%20those%20parts%20of%20the%20glyph.%0D%0A%3Cbr%20%2F%3E%3Cbr%20%2F%3E%0D%0AA%20work%20in%20progress%20for%20sure.%20Any%20help%2Fthoughts%2Frepulsions%2Fbile%20appreciated.%0D%0A%3Cbr%20%2F%3E%3Cbr%20%2F%3E%0D%0ASee%20also%3A%20%3Ca%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Ffontstruct.fontshop.com%2Ffontstructions%2Fshow%2F99643%22%3EChesterfield%20Queen%3C%2Fa%3E%20and%20%3Ca%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Ffontstruct.fontshop.com%2Ffontstructions%2Fshow%2F99642%22%3EChesterfield%20Prince%3C%2Fa%3E

Chesterfield Queen

 by afrojetThis FontStruction was selected by FontStruct staff.This%20FontStruction%20was%20selected%20by%20FontStruct%20staff.
  • Currently 6.8
6.8 (12 votes)
Last change: 03.11.2008
Tags: Condensed, Poster, Sans, Tall, Queen
Category: Sans Serif, Display
52 Downloads52%20Downloads521 Comments1%20Comments198 Glyphs98%20Glyphs98The Chesterfield Royal Family was formed from my desire to add new weights to the original Chesterfield typeface. In the process of drawing these new weights, I began modifying some of the forms of the new glyphs away from the original Chesterfield glyphs in order to build a more flexible brick/grid structure for the development of various weights. The most noticeable difference between these three new faces and the original is the lowered x-height. That said, there are still some compromises between the different weights and because of that I've given them these royalty names instead of the normal practice of light, regular, and bold weight names. One of the biggest compromises occurs in the Prince weight, where I was unable to add the notch where bowls and shoulders meet stems (see King and Queen weights) without adding too much extra black weight to those parts of the glyph. A work in progress for sure. Any help/thoughts/repulsions/bile appreciated. See also: Chesterfield King and Chesterfield Prince.The%20Chesterfield%20Royal%20Family%20was%20formed%20from%20my%20desire%20to%20add%20new%20weights%20to%20%3Ca%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Ffontstruct.fontshop.com%2Ffontstructions%2Fshow%2F78304%22%3Ethe%20original%20Chesterfield%3C%2Fa%3E%20typeface.%20In%20the%20process%20of%20drawing%20these%20new%20weights%2C%20I%20began%20modifying%20some%20of%20the%20forms%20of%20the%20new%20glyphs%20away%20from%20the%20original%20Chesterfield%20glyphs%20in%20order%20to%20build%20a%20more%20flexible%20brick%2Fgrid%20structure%20for%20the%20development%20of%20various%20weights.%20The%20most%20noticeable%20difference%20between%20these%20three%20new%20faces%20and%20the%20original%20is%20the%20lowered%20x-height.%20That%20said%2C%20there%20are%20still%20some%20compromises%20between%20the%20different%20weights%20and%20because%20of%20that%20I%27ve%20given%20them%20these%20royalty%20names%20instead%20of%20the%20normal%20practice%20of%20light%2C%20regular%2C%20and%20bold%20weight%20names.%20One%20of%20the%20biggest%20compromises%20occurs%20in%20the%20Prince%20weight%2C%20where%20I%20was%20unable%20to%20add%20the%20notch%20where%20bowls%20and%20shoulders%20meet%20stems%20%28see%20King%20and%20Queen%20weights%29%20without%20adding%20too%20much%20extra%20black%20weight%20to%20those%20parts%20of%20the%20glyph.%0D%0A%3Cbr%20%2F%3E%3Cbr%20%2F%3E%0D%0AA%20work%20in%20progress%20for%20sure.%20Any%20help%2Fthoughts%2Frepulsions%2Fbile%20appreciated.%0D%0A%3Cbr%20%2F%3E%3Cbr%20%2F%3E%0D%0ASee%20also%3A%20%3Ca%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Ffontstruct.fontshop.com%2Ffontstructions%2Fshow%2F99644%22%3EChesterfield%20King%3C%2Fa%3E%20and%20%3Ca%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Ffontstruct.fontshop.com%2Ffontstructions%2Fshow%2F99642%22%3EChesterfield%20Prince%3C%2Fa%3E.

Chesterfield Prince

 by afrojetThis FontStruction was selected by FontStruct staff.This%20FontStruction%20was%20selected%20by%20FontStruct%20staff.
  • Currently 5.9
5.9 (13 votes)
Last change: 11.11.2008
Tags: Condensed, Poster, Sans, Tall, Prince
Category: Sans Serif, Display
42 Downloads42%20Downloads421 Comments1%20Comments198 Glyphs98%20Glyphs98The Chesterfield Royal Family was formed from my desire to add new weights to the original Chesterfield typeface. In the process of drawing these new weights, I began modifying some of the forms of the new glyphs away from the original Chesterfield glyphs in order to build a more flexible brick/grid structure for the development of various weights. The most noticeable difference between these three new faces and the original is the lowered x-height. That said, there are still some compromises between the different weights and because of that I've given them these royalty names instead of the normal practice of light, regular, and bold weight names. One of the biggest compromises occurs in the Prince weight, where I was unable to add the notch where bowls and shoulders meet stems (see King and Queen weights) without adding too much extra black weight to those parts of the glyph. A work in progress for sure. Any help/thoughts/repulsions/bile appreciated. See also: Chesterfield King and Chesterfield Queen.The%20Chesterfield%20Royal%20Family%20was%20formed%20from%20my%20desire%20to%20add%20new%20weights%20to%20%3Ca%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Ffontstruct.fontshop.com%2Ffontstructions%2Fshow%2F78304%22%3Ethe%20original%20Chesterfield%3C%2Fa%3E%20typeface.%20In%20the%20process%20of%20drawing%20these%20new%20weights%2C%20I%20began%20modifying%20some%20of%20the%20forms%20of%20the%20new%20glyphs%20away%20from%20the%20original%20Chesterfield%20glyphs%20in%20order%20to%20build%20a%20more%20flexible%20brick%2Fgrid%20structure%20for%20the%20development%20of%20various%20weights.%20The%20most%20noticeable%20difference%20between%20these%20three%20new%20faces%20and%20the%20original%20is%20the%20lowered%20x-height.%20That%20said%2C%20there%20are%20still%20some%20compromises%20between%20the%20different%20weights%20and%20because%20of%20that%20I%27ve%20given%20them%20these%20royalty%20names%20instead%20of%20the%20normal%20practice%20of%20light%2C%20regular%2C%20and%20bold%20weight%20names.%20One%20of%20the%20biggest%20compromises%20occurs%20in%20the%20Prince%20weight%2C%20where%20I%20was%20unable%20to%20add%20the%20notch%20where%20bowls%20and%20shoulders%20meet%20stems%20%28see%20King%20and%20Queen%20weights%29%20without%20adding%20too%20much%20extra%20black%20weight%20to%20those%20parts%20of%20the%20glyph.%0D%0A%3Cbr%20%2F%3E%3Cbr%20%2F%3E%0D%0AA%20work%20in%20progress%20for%20sure.%20Any%20help%2Fthoughts%2Frepulsions%2Fbile%20appreciated.%0D%0A%3Cbr%20%2F%3E%3Cbr%20%2F%3E%0D%0ASee%20also%3A%20%3Ca%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Ffontstruct.fontshop.com%2Ffontstructions%2Fshow%2F99644%22%3EChesterfield%20King%3C%2Fa%3E%20and%20%3Ca%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Ffontstruct.fontshop.com%2Ffontstructions%2Fshow%2F99643%22%3EChesterfield%20Queen%3C%2Fa%3E.

Seravek

by Process Type FoundryFontShop.com
Some fonts you just can’t FontStruct. Try a non-modular typeface from FontShop.com