The Gallery: Browse and find FontStructions

What’s New

Top Picks

Everything

We found 30 FontStructions matching “In”. Filter and Sort OptionsFilter and Sort Options

Soul Ninja text

 by lucazevedoThis FontStruction was selected by FontStruct staff.This%20FontStruction%20was%20selected%20by%20FontStruct%20staff.
  • Currently 5.0
5.0 (7 votes)
Last change: 04.01.2009
Tags: Sans, Text, Regular, Friendly, Modern, Tecno, Soul
Category: Sans Serif
28 Downloads28%20Downloads281 Comments1%20Comments198 Glyphs98%20Glyphs98Text version of Soul Ninja... Friendly Sans-serif done in my vacation... Works fine as pixelfont. Hope you enjoy it! If you liked please give it a good rating! Soon with extended latin characters! I promise! More works at: www.lucazevedo.comText%20version%20of%20Soul%20Ninja...%20Friendly%20Sans-serif%20done%20in%20my%20vacation...%20Works%20fine%20as%20pixelfont.%0D%0AHope%20you%20enjoy%20it%21%0D%0AIf%20you%20liked%20please%20give%20it%20a%20good%20rating%21%0D%0ASoon%20with%20extended%20latin%20characters%21%20I%20promise%21%0D%0A%0D%0AMore%20works%20at%3A%0D%0Awww.lucazevedo.com

EUROstruct

 by Axel LeyerThis FontStruction was selected by FontStruct staff.This%20FontStruction%20was%20selected%20by%20FontStruct%20staff.
  • Currently 6.2
6.2 (11 votes)
Last change: 03.11.2008
Tags: Eurostile, Thin
Category: Sans Serif, Display
37 Downloads37%20Downloads376 Comments6%20Comments655 Glyphs55%20Glyphs552x1 brickscaled. I have Eurostyle in my mind when I began this one, but made it without diagonals.2x1%20brickscaled.%20I%20have%20Eurostyle%20in%20my%20mind%20when%20I%20began%20this%20one%2C%20but%20made%20it%20without%20diagonals.

Chesterfield King

 by afrojetThis FontStruction was selected by FontStruct staff.This%20FontStruction%20was%20selected%20by%20FontStruct%20staff.
  • Currently 6.8
6.8 (17 votes)
Last change: 16.12.2008
Tags: Condensed, Poster, Sans, Tall, King
Category: Sans Serif, Display
86 Downloads86%20Downloads867 Comments7%20Comments7161 Glyphs161%20Glyphs161The Chesterfield Royal Family was formed from my desire to add new weights to the original Chesterfield typeface. In the process of drawing these new weights, I began modifying some of the forms of the new glyphs away from the original Chesterfield glyphs in order to build a more flexible brick/grid structure for the development of various weights. The most noticeable difference between these three new faces and the original is the lowered x-height. That said, there are still some compromises between the different weights and because of that I've given them these royalty names instead of the normal practice of light, regular, and bold weight names. One of the biggest compromises occurs in the Prince weight, where I was unable to add the notch where bowls and shoulders meet stems (see King and Queen weights) without adding too much extra black weight to those parts of the glyph. A work in progress for sure. Any help/thoughts/repulsions/bile appreciated. See also: Chesterfield Queen and Chesterfield PrinceThe%20Chesterfield%20Royal%20Family%20was%20formed%20from%20my%20desire%20to%20add%20new%20weights%20to%20%3Ca%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Ffontstruct.fontshop.com%2Ffontstructions%2Fshow%2F78304%22%3Ethe%20original%20Chesterfield%3C%2Fa%3E%20typeface.%20In%20the%20process%20of%20drawing%20these%20new%20weights%2C%20I%20began%20modifying%20some%20of%20the%20forms%20of%20the%20new%20glyphs%20away%20from%20the%20original%20Chesterfield%20glyphs%20in%20order%20to%20build%20a%20more%20flexible%20brick%2Fgrid%20structure%20for%20the%20development%20of%20various%20weights.%20The%20most%20noticeable%20difference%20between%20these%20three%20new%20faces%20and%20the%20original%20is%20the%20lowered%20x-height.%20That%20said%2C%20there%20are%20still%20some%20compromises%20between%20the%20different%20weights%20and%20because%20of%20that%20I%27ve%20given%20them%20these%20royalty%20names%20instead%20of%20the%20normal%20practice%20of%20light%2C%20regular%2C%20and%20bold%20weight%20names.%20One%20of%20the%20biggest%20compromises%20occurs%20in%20the%20Prince%20weight%2C%20where%20I%20was%20unable%20to%20add%20the%20notch%20where%20bowls%20and%20shoulders%20meet%20stems%20%28see%20King%20and%20Queen%20weights%29%20without%20adding%20too%20much%20extra%20black%20weight%20to%20those%20parts%20of%20the%20glyph.%0D%0A%3Cbr%20%2F%3E%3Cbr%20%2F%3E%0D%0AA%20work%20in%20progress%20for%20sure.%20Any%20help%2Fthoughts%2Frepulsions%2Fbile%20appreciated.%0D%0A%3Cbr%20%2F%3E%3Cbr%20%2F%3E%0D%0ASee%20also%3A%20%3Ca%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Ffontstruct.fontshop.com%2Ffontstructions%2Fshow%2F99643%22%3EChesterfield%20Queen%3C%2Fa%3E%20and%20%3Ca%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Ffontstruct.fontshop.com%2Ffontstructions%2Fshow%2F99642%22%3EChesterfield%20Prince%3C%2Fa%3E

Chesterfield Queen

 by afrojetThis FontStruction was selected by FontStruct staff.This%20FontStruction%20was%20selected%20by%20FontStruct%20staff.
  • Currently 6.8
6.8 (12 votes)
Last change: 03.11.2008
Tags: Condensed, Poster, Sans, Tall, Queen
Category: Sans Serif, Display
52 Downloads52%20Downloads521 Comments1%20Comments198 Glyphs98%20Glyphs98The Chesterfield Royal Family was formed from my desire to add new weights to the original Chesterfield typeface. In the process of drawing these new weights, I began modifying some of the forms of the new glyphs away from the original Chesterfield glyphs in order to build a more flexible brick/grid structure for the development of various weights. The most noticeable difference between these three new faces and the original is the lowered x-height. That said, there are still some compromises between the different weights and because of that I've given them these royalty names instead of the normal practice of light, regular, and bold weight names. One of the biggest compromises occurs in the Prince weight, where I was unable to add the notch where bowls and shoulders meet stems (see King and Queen weights) without adding too much extra black weight to those parts of the glyph. A work in progress for sure. Any help/thoughts/repulsions/bile appreciated. See also: Chesterfield King and Chesterfield Prince.The%20Chesterfield%20Royal%20Family%20was%20formed%20from%20my%20desire%20to%20add%20new%20weights%20to%20%3Ca%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Ffontstruct.fontshop.com%2Ffontstructions%2Fshow%2F78304%22%3Ethe%20original%20Chesterfield%3C%2Fa%3E%20typeface.%20In%20the%20process%20of%20drawing%20these%20new%20weights%2C%20I%20began%20modifying%20some%20of%20the%20forms%20of%20the%20new%20glyphs%20away%20from%20the%20original%20Chesterfield%20glyphs%20in%20order%20to%20build%20a%20more%20flexible%20brick%2Fgrid%20structure%20for%20the%20development%20of%20various%20weights.%20The%20most%20noticeable%20difference%20between%20these%20three%20new%20faces%20and%20the%20original%20is%20the%20lowered%20x-height.%20That%20said%2C%20there%20are%20still%20some%20compromises%20between%20the%20different%20weights%20and%20because%20of%20that%20I%27ve%20given%20them%20these%20royalty%20names%20instead%20of%20the%20normal%20practice%20of%20light%2C%20regular%2C%20and%20bold%20weight%20names.%20One%20of%20the%20biggest%20compromises%20occurs%20in%20the%20Prince%20weight%2C%20where%20I%20was%20unable%20to%20add%20the%20notch%20where%20bowls%20and%20shoulders%20meet%20stems%20%28see%20King%20and%20Queen%20weights%29%20without%20adding%20too%20much%20extra%20black%20weight%20to%20those%20parts%20of%20the%20glyph.%0D%0A%3Cbr%20%2F%3E%3Cbr%20%2F%3E%0D%0AA%20work%20in%20progress%20for%20sure.%20Any%20help%2Fthoughts%2Frepulsions%2Fbile%20appreciated.%0D%0A%3Cbr%20%2F%3E%3Cbr%20%2F%3E%0D%0ASee%20also%3A%20%3Ca%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Ffontstruct.fontshop.com%2Ffontstructions%2Fshow%2F99644%22%3EChesterfield%20King%3C%2Fa%3E%20and%20%3Ca%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Ffontstruct.fontshop.com%2Ffontstructions%2Fshow%2F99642%22%3EChesterfield%20Prince%3C%2Fa%3E.

Chesterfield Prince

 by afrojetThis FontStruction was selected by FontStruct staff.This%20FontStruction%20was%20selected%20by%20FontStruct%20staff.
  • Currently 5.9
5.9 (13 votes)
Last change: 11.11.2008
Tags: Condensed, Poster, Sans, Tall, Prince
Category: Sans Serif, Display
42 Downloads42%20Downloads421 Comments1%20Comments198 Glyphs98%20Glyphs98The Chesterfield Royal Family was formed from my desire to add new weights to the original Chesterfield typeface. In the process of drawing these new weights, I began modifying some of the forms of the new glyphs away from the original Chesterfield glyphs in order to build a more flexible brick/grid structure for the development of various weights. The most noticeable difference between these three new faces and the original is the lowered x-height. That said, there are still some compromises between the different weights and because of that I've given them these royalty names instead of the normal practice of light, regular, and bold weight names. One of the biggest compromises occurs in the Prince weight, where I was unable to add the notch where bowls and shoulders meet stems (see King and Queen weights) without adding too much extra black weight to those parts of the glyph. A work in progress for sure. Any help/thoughts/repulsions/bile appreciated. See also: Chesterfield King and Chesterfield Queen.The%20Chesterfield%20Royal%20Family%20was%20formed%20from%20my%20desire%20to%20add%20new%20weights%20to%20%3Ca%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Ffontstruct.fontshop.com%2Ffontstructions%2Fshow%2F78304%22%3Ethe%20original%20Chesterfield%3C%2Fa%3E%20typeface.%20In%20the%20process%20of%20drawing%20these%20new%20weights%2C%20I%20began%20modifying%20some%20of%20the%20forms%20of%20the%20new%20glyphs%20away%20from%20the%20original%20Chesterfield%20glyphs%20in%20order%20to%20build%20a%20more%20flexible%20brick%2Fgrid%20structure%20for%20the%20development%20of%20various%20weights.%20The%20most%20noticeable%20difference%20between%20these%20three%20new%20faces%20and%20the%20original%20is%20the%20lowered%20x-height.%20That%20said%2C%20there%20are%20still%20some%20compromises%20between%20the%20different%20weights%20and%20because%20of%20that%20I%27ve%20given%20them%20these%20royalty%20names%20instead%20of%20the%20normal%20practice%20of%20light%2C%20regular%2C%20and%20bold%20weight%20names.%20One%20of%20the%20biggest%20compromises%20occurs%20in%20the%20Prince%20weight%2C%20where%20I%20was%20unable%20to%20add%20the%20notch%20where%20bowls%20and%20shoulders%20meet%20stems%20%28see%20King%20and%20Queen%20weights%29%20without%20adding%20too%20much%20extra%20black%20weight%20to%20those%20parts%20of%20the%20glyph.%0D%0A%3Cbr%20%2F%3E%3Cbr%20%2F%3E%0D%0AA%20work%20in%20progress%20for%20sure.%20Any%20help%2Fthoughts%2Frepulsions%2Fbile%20appreciated.%0D%0A%3Cbr%20%2F%3E%3Cbr%20%2F%3E%0D%0ASee%20also%3A%20%3Ca%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Ffontstruct.fontshop.com%2Ffontstructions%2Fshow%2F99644%22%3EChesterfield%20King%3C%2Fa%3E%20and%20%3Ca%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Ffontstruct.fontshop.com%2Ffontstructions%2Fshow%2F99643%22%3EChesterfield%20Queen%3C%2Fa%3E.

monomum

 by thalamicThis FontStruction was selected by FontStruct staff.This%20FontStruction%20was%20selected%20by%20FontStruct%20staff.
  • Currently 6.8
6.8 (15 votes)
Last change: 23.12.2008
Tags: Monospace, Stylized, Small Size, Optimized, Legibility, Experiment, Fail, T S Eliot
Category: Sans Serif, Display
62 Downloads62%20Downloads6217 Comments17%20Comments1767 Glyphs67%20Glyphs67There's no inspiration here other than a desire to create a stylized mono-spaced font that is legible at small sizes. It's a solution to a fabricated problem. Getting the basic characters in, it is, evidently, not mono-spaced, even though all glyphs end at the same grid square on the right. One problem is the lack of control over the width of space. Other issues come up as well, such as the period (full stop) has to be way over there to the right of this font's grid to make it the same width as the rest of the characters.Conclusion? Mono-spaced fonts are just not possible in fontstruct at this point. :( Correct me if I am wrong. Rob?There%27s%20no%20inspiration%20here%20other%20than%20a%20desire%20to%20create%20a%20stylized%20mono-spaced%20font%20that%20is%20legible%20at%20small%20sizes.%20It%27s%20a%20solution%20to%20a%20fabricated%20problem.%20Getting%20the%20basic%20characters%20in%2C%20it%20is%2C%20evidently%2C%20not%20mono-spaced%2C%20even%20though%20all%20glyphs%20end%20at%20the%20same%20grid%20square%20on%20the%20right.%20One%20problem%20is%20the%20lack%20of%20control%20over%20the%20width%20of%20space.%20Other%20issues%20come%20up%20as%20well%2C%20such%20as%20the%20period%20%28full%20stop%29%20has%20to%20be%20way%20over%20there%20to%20the%20right%20of%20this%20font%27s%20grid%20to%20make%20it%20the%20same%20width%20as%20the%20rest%20of%20the%20characters.%3Cbr%3E%3Cbr%3EConclusion%3F%20Mono-spaced%20fonts%20are%20just%20not%20possible%20in%20fontstruct%20at%20this%20point.%20%3A%28%20Correct%20me%20if%20I%20am%20wrong.%20Rob%3F

freakishly weird regular

 by bigvoice313
  • Currently 5.0
5.0 (2 votes)
Last change: 12.09.2008
Tags: Fonts
Category: Sans Serif
9 Downloads9%20Downloads998 Glyphs98%20Glyphs98This combines "Moblie Infratry" with "SSi" in an unique sense of a different styleThis%20combines%20%22Moblie%20Infratry%22%20with%20%22SSi%22%20in%20an%20unique%20sense%20of%20a%20different%20style

Doodeka

 by Em42This FontStruction was selected by FontStruct staff.This%20FontStruction%20was%20selected%20by%20FontStruct%20staff.
  • Currently 7.3
7.3 (15 votes)
Last change: 04.11.2008
Tags: Extrabold, Bold, Geometric, Futura, Sans
Category: Sans Serif, Display
137 Downloads137%20Downloads13716 Comments16%20Comments16199 Glyphs199%20Glyphs199A futuresque extra-bold font built around a dodecagonal shape. See the font in use here.A%20%3Cem%3Efuturesque%3C%2Fem%3E%20extra-bold%20font%20built%20around%20a%20dodecagonal%20shape.%0D%0A%0D%0ASee%20the%20font%20in%20use%20%3Ca%20href%3D%22http%3A%2F%2Fwww.house42.com%2F2008%2F07%2F26%2Fdoodeka-fontstruct-font%2F%22%3Ehere%3C%2Fa%3E.

Troy Thin

 by JustinOperable
  • Currently 4.5
4.5 (6 votes)
Last change: 08.08.2008
Tags: Sans, Metropolitan, Thin
Category: Sans Serif
10 Downloads10%20Downloads101 Comments1%20Comments198 Glyphs98%20Glyphs98Tried to make a designer-style font similar in some respects to Eurostile or Microgramma. Look at the pixel preview, for some reason, it screws up the letters when you look at them with the "Show all letters" optionTried%20to%20make%20a%20designer-style%20font%20similar%20in%20some%20respects%20to%20Eurostile%20or%20Microgramma.%20Look%20at%20the%20pixel%20preview%2C%20for%20some%20reason%2C%20it%20screws%20up%20the%20letters%20when%20you%20look%20at%20them%20with%20the%20%22Show%20all%20letters%22%20option

verysimple

 by lexandr
  • Currently 4.5
4.5 (4 votes)
Last change: 11.06.2008
Tags: Sans, Gothic, Simple, 4x3, Grid
Category: Sans Serif
4 Downloads4%20Downloads462 Glyphs62%20Glyphs62A very simple (duh) sans, still a work in progress, I'm not satisfied with a few glyphs and want to add many moreA%20very%20simple%20%28duh%29%20sans%2C%20still%20a%20work%20in%20progress%2C%20I%27m%20not%20satisfied%20with%20a%20few%20glyphs%20and%20want%20to%20add%20many%20more

Seravek

by Process Type FoundryFontShop.com
Some fonts you just can’t FontStruct. Try a non-modular typeface from FontShop.com